Overview

Ryokan Ohto

Hitosujime-minami-sagaru Nanajo-Kamogawa-higashi Higashiyama, Kyoto 605-0994, Japan
+81 755 417 803

AED 147+

Overall guest ratings

5.3/10 OK
Based on 933 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 6.0
  • 3.6
  • 3.2

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Located in Higashiyama, this ryokan is within a 15-minute walk of Sanjusangendo Temple, Kyoto Tower, and Higashi Honganji Temple. Kiyomizu Temple and Gion Corner are also within 2 mi (3 km).

    Less More
    Expedia

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Laundry service
    • Pets not allowed
    • Terrace/Patio
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall rating

    5.3 OK
    Based on 933 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.4 "94% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 88%."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 6.0 "Food is average."
    • 5.6 "Internet is average."
    • 5.1 "Average value."
    • 3.6 "Service is below average."
      4.5 "55% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      4.3 "57% didn't like the management."
      3.1 "69% thought the service was unprofessional."
      2.2 "Bad housekeeping, according to 78%."
      1.7 "Hotel security was horrible, thought 83%."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.4 "56% complained about the elevator."
      2.5 "75% found the grounds unpleasant."
      1.4 "For 86%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 3.1 "Awful breakfast."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      2.6 "74% complained about the bathroom."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were dirty."
      1.9 "81% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.1 "For 89%, the rooms looked old."
      1.4 "86% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.7 "83% found problems with the furniture."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
      1.7 "83% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."
      1.9 "81% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.1 OK
    Based on 457 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "95% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 5.8 "Internet is average."
    • 4.8 "Value below average."
    • 3.6 "Service is below average."
      4.3 "57% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      4.6 "54% didn't like the management."
      3.0 "70% thought the service was unprofessional."
      2.1 "Bad housekeeping, according to 79%."
    • 3.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.5 "85% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "87% said rooms were dirty."
      2.0 "80% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.5 "75% said rooms were small."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.1 "89% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.4 "For 86%, the rooms looked old."
      2.1 "79% found problems with the furniture."
    View all review categories

    Overall rating

    5.1 OK
    Based on 233 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "95% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      8.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 87%."
    • 3.8 "Service is below average."
      4.5 "55% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.5 "65% thought the service was unprofessional."
      2.3 "Bad housekeeping, according to 77%."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the management."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.4 "56% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.7 "Awful rooms."
      2.4 "76% complained about the bathroom."
      1.7 "83% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% said rooms were dirty."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.6 "Horrible vibe."
      1.0 "90% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.5 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      1.7 "83% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.9 "51% thought it was too noisy."

    Overall rating

    5.7 OK
    Based on 242 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      9.3 "93% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 5.8 "Internet is average."
    • 3.6 "Service is below average."
      4.8 "52% indicated the reception staff was not good."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the management."
    • 3.5 "Bad amenities."
      3.7 "63% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.9 "71% found the grounds unpleasant."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      1.8 "82% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      2.1 "79% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.1 "79% said rooms were small."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.5 "85% found problems with the furniture."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.1 "79% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.1 "79% said rooms were small."
    • 2.7 "Horrible vibe."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      4.7 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 53%."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close